LINKS
Dan D: Master of film
Frankenblog
a-ha official
The Dark Knight
Batman On Film
Bjork official
Christopher Lee official
Depeche Mode official
Digital Bits
Downey Unlimited
Hollywood Reporter
Jim Carrey Online
Morrissey Solo
Mozaic
New Order Online
Pet Shop Boys official
Stallone Zone
Star 5
Super Hero Hype

DISCLAIMER:
All words posted on this blog are the sole property of Michael Duffy (except where noted). Images are collected from the web and are shared herein to illustrate film reviews and opinions. If you are the owner of an image and do not wish to see it used for these purposes, please email me and I will remove it.
|
Tuesday, June 14, 2005
It take guts to be gentle and kind... 
Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith
I was impressed by this film - then again, I went in after a week of marathon researching and writing on my PhD, so I was fully anticipating something to take me away from the monotony of the daily world, and into a universe far, far away.
Whatever my mood, the fact is I thought this film was engaging on precisely the level that it should be, and that's all that matters. A good friend of mine recently wrote of his disappointment over the harsh criticism the film is receiving, or rather the "faint praise", such as: "well, it's certainly much better than the last two, but that isn't saying much." Or, "Lucas' interest in the less-human side of filmmaking is still quite apparent." These are cop-out, easy answers. Yes, of course Lucas has a special effects company to run, and of course he will want to create projects for that facility that give them work, but many forget that Lucas' own interest in technology spans back to the beginning of his career. From the beginning, Lucas has been interested in what you could call the "basic human [or possibly male] instincts", war, fascination with technology, racing, and coming of age. Lucas channelled all of these into the first Star Wars film he completed in 1977 -- and cannily turned it into a movie/product franchise the likes of which the world has not seen since.
Right before the first Star Wars prequel was released in 1999, I can remember feeling this intense excitement at seeing the first trailer, getting caught up in it all, even though I had never been a huge, huge fan of Star Wars when I was kid -- though in general you could say I had as much of an interest in the original movies as anyone else. I had some figures and toys, and used to check out my friend's much better collection at his house. Above all, in these last couple of decades, Lucas has become a savvy marketer, shamelessly pushing a never-ending stream of Star Wars products onto the marketplace, never fearing or succumbing to the increasing amount of criticism he received for slowly turning himself into what his very stories were about -- an Evil Empire. Still, the excitement surrounding the release of Episode I: The Phantom Menace, arguably surpassed any movie hype since Batman (1989), and I fully admit I was as caught up in it as everyone else. I saw The Phantom Menace maybe three or four times at the historic Senator Theatre in Baltimore, Maryland -- a venue that, like the rebellion in the original Star Wars films, has faced destruction [close of business] many times, but through hope, perseverance and collegial support, has ultimately triumphed [and survived] at the last possible moment.
When The Phantom Menace was released, the criticism of Lucas' enormous ambitions and antiquated sensibilities began to flow. I was indeed aware of all this criticism, but like most others, was willing to deal with the awful voices that constituted the "Trade Federation" and "Jar-Jar Binks" in order to reach that climactic 20 minutes just once more. Mainly, I was impressed by the much underwritten but very nicely stylized and well-trained character of Darth Maul, and the 2-on-1 duel that occupied much of the film's final moments. The choreography of that fight, partly accomplished by the actor who played Maul himself (though not in voice), Ray Park, surpassed any fight sequence in the original Star Wars movies. I came back a few times just to experience the tension in that final reel. I felt the pod race had some good energy as well.
Upon the release of Episode II: Attack of the Clones, three years later, the Star Wars community was a "once bitten, twice shy" sort of crowd, wary of what might come, but looking forward to the progression of Anakin Skywalker and Obi-Wan Kenobi's story, in the hope that the eventual darker turns in their careers might somehow add gravity to this new set of films. Sadly, "Clones" turned out to be much of the same (in this critic's opinion), if not, somehow, even intangibly weaker than Episode I in some respects. [Could this have something to do with the fact that at least some of Episode I was filmed in/on real-world settings, whereas by Episode II, nearly 100% of the film was shot on studio sets?] Still, I again enjoyed the final twenty minutes or so, and like most others, hooted greatly when experiencing Yoda's first visualized fight sequence (though it could have lasted just a bit longer), with the great Christopher Lee (as Count Dooku/Lord Tyrannus). Although I must say, tremendously noticeable to me, and to some others with interest, was the somewhat shoddy computer design for melding Christopher Lee's stunt/action double with his actual head. If you pause select frames, you can probably see what I am talking about. Dreadful, dreadful stuff, and for Lucas' ILM (Industrial Light & Magic), still one of the premiere special effects houses in the business, it's inexcusable. I also found some minor fulfilment in the paralleling of Luke's loss of limb at the finale of The Empire Strikes Back, as here (in "Clones"), Anakin"s arrogance causes him to lose his forearm to Count Dooku's sabre. There were problems as usual -- the dialogue was still mostly atrocious, and barrenness of most of the central performances kind of makes the whole thing feel dry, like sandpaper (natch). I'm still not sure about the strange, A.I. -like aliens who specialized in cloning, though they were an interesting diversion for a Lucas-controlled narrative. And while I found Jango Fett's story mildly intriguing, I had much more of a feeling that Lucas here was pandering to the fanboys who had developed a following for the relatively minor original series character Boba Fett throughout the years.
Now, I have seen Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, and what can I say? I had thought about this day ever since finishing with Episode II, as to where I would be in the world, and what I would be doing, when this day would come. Thoughts like these I feel are not only reserved for "ultimate fans" or "fanboys," but are simply a reflection of the meaning of a globally-known and considered film franchise and its place in our world. Soon, I was able to come to the conclusion that, due to my impending status as a PhD student, I would likely be enjoying (or not) this movie during the climactic period of accomplishing the written work for my thesis, which is in fact where I am right now.
First off, I'll admit that my increasing work deadlines directly influenced a two-week delay in seeing the film at the cinemas -- and more importantly, that I wasn't that bothered by it. Yes, my expectations, like many others', had been tempered by the last two films, and the fact that, well, I was really growing up, and was this stuff of my interest anymore when Lucas seemed to be primarily aiming these new prequels at children? The trailers didn't really change my mind, to be honest, other than a shot or two of a hooded and scarred Chancellor Palpatine/Darth Sidious/The Emperor throwing a nasty look at the camera. Would the actors get any more time to breathe in between Lucas' (and whatever ghost scriptwriter he had with him this time) corny dialogue? Would the story involve something more interesting that trade disputes and "separatist movements"? Would this supposed finale to Lucas' Star Wars feature franchise actually feature anything memorable? In my opinion, the answer to all of the above questions is a resounding "YES." Like I said at the beginning of this piece, maybe it was the mood I went into the film with, or maybe it was the summer season bringing some kind of open-minded willingness to accept a fun diversion, but for the most part I really, really enjoyed Episode III, and I'd like to tell you about it.
[I'll assume here that most of you reading this are familiar with general Star Wars lore and history, and have also probably already seen this film. Many narrative "spoilers" will be discussed.]
From the moment this movie begins I found much more to get engrossed in, to think about, and most importantly, to feel. Someone said to me just before I wrote this, that he felt the film could have used a Han Solo-type character, some "human" presence to root for amidst all the mystic Jedis, countless androids and curious aliens. I couldn't disagree more -- what this film had to me that the first two prequels didn't, was a heart. If you want to take me literally, please look first to the astonishing moment when Obi-Wan, in a desperate attempt to gain an advantage, cracks open General Grievous' metal chest to find, wonder of all wonders, a beating heart struggling to survive. Now we see why the creatively conceived Grievous has been strangely coughing throughout his earlier few appearances in the film. Could it be perhaps that Grievous represents an early sinister "experiment" by Palpatine to mold the flesh with the machine? "Nothing good can come of this." Indeed. There is real empathy and tragedy in this moment. This new "heartfelt" approach is also borne out in the portrayal of Yoda on screen (once again, completely digitally rendered by ILM). As a good friend of mine noted, Yoda's "clutching at the heart" scene, and all the rest of his appearances, felt as real as any other heartfelt moment I'd seen in recent cinema.
I laughed out loud at the early back-and-forth between Anakin and Obi-Wan as they attempt to rescue a "captured" Chancellor Palpatine from General Grievous' ship [This might very well have been where some of the rumoured Tom Stoppard script assistance was]. The space battle here that opens the film includes some unbelievable shots and angles, bringing you immediately and fully into a major battle which seems to be getting closer and closer in style and ferocity to the kind of showdowns and dogfights which we see in Episode's IV, V and VI. When Skywalker and Kenobi get into the ship and discover where Palpatine is, the room is dark, ominous, empty. No guards. You know something is not right. And then Count Dooku shows up.

Given a decently rousing battle at the conclusion of Episode II, Christopher Lee again here wholly embodies the character, who leaps somewhat inexplicably (more on this digital trickery later) from a loft above, onto equal footing with Anakin and Obi-Wan. As Obi-Wan advises Anakin, "This time, we'll take him together", I felt the excitement in my emotions. Still, though Anakin does not charge into the battle as he did so immodestly in Episode II, Obi-Wan here is soon dispatched under a piece of the ship's wall by Dooku. So Anakin must again face this snarling, sinister and charming presence who now exclaims almost joyfully, "I've been looking forward to this." Anakin says something like, "My skills have doubled since last we met", but Lee counters wonderfully with "Good. Twice the pride. Double the fall." It's a wonderful piece of dialogue delivered perfectly by Lee, who at 83 (though I believe only 80 when most of the filming took place) is looking and sounding just as powerful as he did on screen 40 years ago. He is still one of our most under-appreciated actors. After Anakin slices off Dooku's hands, and holds him in a double-lightsaber embrace of death, Palpatine assumes his Sith lord voice, and tells Anakin forcibly, "Kill him." Though the boy struggles, he soon makes that choice that we know will push him a significant notch further down the path to the dark side; and right before he removes Dooku's head, Lee gives a look of utter surprise and contempt to Palpatine, as he realizes that this old "chancellor" is indeed more evil and greedy than he could possibly fathom. Lee's time on-screen in brief here, but the battle, and his subsequent downfall, leaves an impression that nothing is certain in this film, and that everything and everyone has the potential to be corrupted, or die horribly.
The rest of the film begins the rapid descent for Anakin, to a horrifying defeat by Obi-Wan which will solidify him becoming Darth Vader. As the film progresses, Anakin begins to experience dreams, nightmares about his wife (Padme Amidala, a much more free-to-experience Natalie Portman) and impending childbirth. Her news of pregnancy barely registers with Anakin before he is called upon to "have an audience" with Senator Palpatine, who wants Anakin to be his "eyes and ears" on the Jedi Council. The Council also asks Anakin to spy on Palpatine's dealings. So, already here we have a much more interesting emotional tug-of-war than was happening in the previous two films. It doesn't matter if Hayden Christensen is not Marlon Brando when it comes to acting and emoting, because everything else makes up for it here.
In Episode III, the actors actually get time to act instead of just recite the stilted dialogue presented to them. I really enjoyed Natalie Portman's extended moments, and Ewan McGregor's sighs and dreadful pauses as he increasingly realizes that everything he's worked so hard for in this boy is disappearing, and that things in general are going to hell. But the greatest presence, and performance, in this film has got to be Ian McDiarmid's subtle, engrossing and finally disturbing portrayal of a Palpatine, who in this film ascends to Emperor. My favourite scenes in this film are the ones where he is coaxing and manipulating Anakin, none more so than the confrontation between Palpatine and Mace Windu (a purely into-his-role Samuel L. Jackson), which escalates into anger, hate and fear as Anakin arrives and is forced to choose a side. To give a reason for the Emperor's old-dry facial appearance (as he is later seen in Return of the Jedi) is a nice touch here; and Palpatine's manipulation of Anakin, acting weak and battered as if he is about to die, pulled me back and forth between dread, fear and anticipation. The moments following, when Palpatine rises and shows fully his scarred, bulbous face, seem at once a bad makeup job and literally more disturbing than I could imagine. The way his voice modulates between sanity and insanity in these fragile moments, as he determines the path that will provide the layout for the next three films, was immensely gripping to me. As he dons the hood that will later be part of his signature look as the Emperor, I realized how it was all coming together in this film. Some may find it laughable, but I think they're missing the point. This film (and all of Lucas's Star Wars movies) are immensely indebted to 1930s adventure serials, which often featured strange, twisted villains who were not always completely eliminated by journeys' end. People who criticize moments like this I feel are forgetting the very sentiments which prescribe how you should view these films from the very beginning: A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away.
The Jedi massacres that follow, and the build-up to a confrontation we know is coming, but we still do not want to see, achieve an epic-ness that almost returns us to any of the best moments in the original three films. The way in which "Order 66" is executed simply but brilliantly conveys how the Clone troopers turn on their own Republic and become Galactic Stormtroopers. Lucas's son, in a fine cameo, gallantly defends Senator Bail Organa (Jimmy Smits) and battles a barrage of clones before he is painfully struck down. Revenge of the Sith is as close as Lucas is going to get to replicating the feeling behind his original films -- and it' s precisely because he must link it to those films. John Williams' score here once again impresses (it's always been one of the superior elements), but in this film the dark, depressing mood of events causes Williams to go deeper into a chasm of dread than he's possibly ever done, barring some of his score for Schindler's List. The sound mixing in this film is phenomenal as well, again a high point of this filmmaking aspect was to me the cracking open of General Grievous' chest.
One of the nice surprises here is Palpatine's confrontation with Yoda -- a moment never really alluded to in the original trilogy, but surely in place with both story and mythology in Lucas' universe. It's great seeing Yoda twist and parry one last time, and I definitely got the feeling that this is the battle which changed Yoda's perception of his place in the universe -- and how he must learn to survive in it. "Failed, I have", he says later. That is the grand theme of this film: everyone fails in their respective missions to aid, influence or defeat their "chosen ones" -- except for Palpatine.
Finally, the central narrative point this film leads to, that of the "birth" of Darth Vader, is handled with startling horror and honesty. As Obi-Wan stands at the top of the entrance to his ship, which has landed on Mustafar so that Padme may confront Anakin one last time, we know shit's about to go down. Their duel is forceful, brash, and close, often times veering on intelligibility through its waves of saber twists and flips into midair. It's a stunning piece of battlework that, while possibly not quite eclipsing some of the moves in Episode I's finale, far outweighs it emotionally, as here, we don't really know who to root for. As Anakin's arrogance once again outshines his abilities, the battle ends. Too quickly, too abruptly, you might say -- but isn't that how all duels end? With a slash to a vital organ, not a poke to the edge of skin? Is that not the very point of a duel -- to best your opponent through skill and countenance? Anakin screams "I HATE YOU" as Obi-Wan distressingly walks away. His greatest student has become his greatest loss, his greatest tragedy. Anakin's legs and arms are lost, but who is actually experiencing more pain here?

One of the only major criticisms I really have for this film is that Padme's death is explained away as in essence, "dying from a broken heart". I suppose it is plausible that Anakin has perhaps wounded her so much emotionally (and finally, physically, through his force-choke hold on her in their final moments together), that the stress of birthing twins was too much for her too take. If that is the premise, however, it does not do much good to have a robot doctor say at the start of the scene that "by all indications she is very healthy". Yet, it fits with what I've been considering as the theme of the film -- heartbreak.
Vader's birth, back on an operating table somewhere unexplained, is painful in its visual graphicness. Williams' score melds with Anakin's screams as the robotic limbs are inserted, but the pain we experience is no less because of this attempt at artistic numbing. His scarred face is unrecognizable, and the choice to have the robot in charge of the operation mirror that which repairs Luke's hand at the end of Empire, immediately links us visually and subliminally yet again to the original trilogy. I'd argue that there is an extraordinary kind of merging happening in these scenes, as Lucas cuts back and forth between Vader's "birth" and Padme's "death", this "making of" an iconic figure of cinema is simultaneously bewildering and enlightening. It's an epiphany of strategic franchise manipulation -- the machines of the future are truly melding with the "damaged" humans of the past. When Vader "rises", I almost felt as if I could laugh, but in a maniacal, kind of knowing way. His movements reflect Frankenstein's monster in their respective clunkiness. It's quite brilliant, in a simple way. Because this iconic figure of villainy is finally given a "origin" scene, some may feel as if a bit of the mystery is taken away in their decades-long attachment to the character, but I think it's something more akin to "I once was lost, but now I am found." He cannot be Anakin anymore (at least on this physical realm), so why not be something else -- why not "embrace the dark side"? Many critics and fans have not taken seriously the "Noooooo" that Vader delivers once the Emperor tells him that he "killed" her. My impression of this moment is not that he is simply distraught that she is dead -- but rather that he very quickly realizes that truth within himself: that he did in fact "kill" her with his very own destructive nature. Vader's "Noooooo" signifies his final loss of human nature, his transformation of being and finally his ascendancy to a position he is most surely qualified for, but will one day abdicate, for those very ideals which he gave up the moment he joined forces with the Emperor. As Lucas features shots of Darth Vader standing side by side with the Emperor on a Star Destroyer (with a very nice small cameo from Moff Tarkin -- is he Grand yet?), the prequels and the later episodes are seamlessly linked.
It is here that I will mention one of my only other strange problems of Episode III, and the prequels in general. There often seems a bit too much "flipping" and acrobatics in the fight sequences; as Lucas was simply not able to accomplish such feats with actors in the original films (yet he was still able to visualize a few). The availability and appropriation of digital technology has allowed for the birth of "digital stunt doubles", which digital artists can create and implement into a scene for moves that human actors could not accomplish (you saw much of this work excellently done in Spider-Man 2). Initially with the Star Wars prequels, there is a feeling that possibly this is all a bit wild, that it significantly places these films in a different era than that which surrounded the original films -- just because they can do it, should they? Yet, even this supposed shift in sensibility can be explained aesthetically -- one could argue that, due to the weariness, loss and dementia instilled in the few remaining "fighters" in the universe because of the seismic shifts caused by the Emperor's ascendancy, the "force", or spirit of the universe, has significantly reduced its overall focus and "effect" on the individuals whom can control and manipulate it. It's a mystical, slightly hazy, probably weak argument, but it can be made.
In the final moments of Episode III, we are given some hope for the future in strict narrative connections to Episode IV which include the final meeting between a downtrodden Yoda, Obi-Wan and Bail Organa, and the trading off of the twins to their separate locations. As the film ends without dialogue, we are allowed to tentatively embrace the future, and yes, go home and open up those DVDs of Episodes IV-VI (though I must say here that I have much less ambition to see Lucas' constant "retro-fitting" of these earlier episodes via digital technology). The choice here to have a musical and montage-laden finale sequence, rather than a piece of dialogue (as Lucas has done with all the films), is a good one. It is Lucas' final attempt to provide a clear link between these much maligned and definitely different prequels to his highly regarded and endlessly toiled-with later episodes. As the film finished, I watched the credits to the end. Admittedly I always do this, as I am often interested in some of these obscure details, and rewarding all the hard work that goes into filmmaking everyday. But this time, I hardly read any of the credits -- I was so in tune with the film, its place in this franchise, its cultural moment, that all I could do was let the music seep through my ears and try to connect with this universe one last time.
It worked for me. Episode III accomplished what it set out to do, in my mind. For some people, that's not enough, but for me (and some others), it's just right. Lucas may not be the same person he once was. Filmmaking may not be the same. Digital technology has changed everything, but the humanity is still there -- if you look for it and work for it. Despite not expecting to (or possibly not even wanting to), I identified with the movie, its characters and its spirit. The creative choices made for this film almost all work, in my opinion. You don't have to like it, but you can find ways to live with it -- and that's what the central characters in this film had to do. Episode III is a phenomenal piece of entertainment on a grand scale. There, I'm a hype machine. So what? I was never a big Star Wars fan, but I sure sound like one, don't I? May the force be with you. Yes, that was 4,000 words. If you got through it all, let me know and I'll send you a cookie.
Next up, Batman Begins.
Posted by Michael D. @ 8:02 PM |
Monday, June 13, 2005
The First Post Ever: My name is not David Duchovny
(and no, this isn't a fan page for "House of Flying Daggers")
The Mixmaster interviews Michael D. on the reasons for this blog, his general feelings of woe at the state of the universe, and if he will ever don the Batsuit again (what?)...
So, first off -- why are you starting this blog?
Well, I found that I've got quite a lot to say about movies and life in general that would not conceivably fit into my Ph.D., or any other article of critical repute. Inspired by a very good friend of mine (and another one I haven't even met yet), I have realized my second path in life -- to provide willing participants with an honest, reasonably intelligent and hopefully engaging (and sometimes funny) wire to my thoughts... bzzzzzt...("I have a thought...it's coming...it's coming...it's gone.")
What will be the content on this page?
Generally it will focus on me talking about film, usually movie "reviews". But I will feel free (and my friends will hopefully feel free to read) other matters that travel through my brain from day to day. These will often, but not exclusively, focus on the film industry -- like, for example, "Why is Brett Ratner directing X-Men 3?!"
I want this to be a little interactive, too -- if there is something you want me to write about (or at least write my take on), let me know. For example, I'm still waiting for Dan to write up something on Laurence Fishburne's terrifying performance in What's Love Got to Do With It... I may get to it first!
How often will it be updated?
That I cannot say, but hopefully I'll be able to tune my thoughts at least once a week or so. As soon as we work out the kinks in design (which that friend I haven't met is helping me with), I should be updating regularly. As most my friends will know, however, I am in the final stages of the Ph.D., and I also do not have concrete future plans, thus I will occasionally have moments (or periods) where a void in content will be present... but do not fret, as I intend to eventually show my tiny tail to taunt you all a second (or 500th) time.
What's with the blog title?
"House of D" was just an immediate, gut reaction to my thoughts for a title. It's not seminal, it's not important, and has no greater meaning -- I just thought it was an easy way to identify that "this is my domain." Hey, I also just came up with a title for my Ph.D. in minutes -- but that took three years of gestating...
What's the David Duchovny reference up top mean?
As most of you know, David Duchovny starred as Fox Mulder on The X-Files for more than a decade, and played the same character for the feature film version of the show in 1998. However, as some of you may not know, David Duchovny also has a film, directed by and starring David Duchovny himself, which was released recently (after a year on the shelves), and it just happens to be called House of D. So, I'm just reiterating to anyone who finds my page via "google" or some other swanky search engine, that I am in no way related, friends with, supporting or otherwise engaged in any way with Mr. Duchovny or his frankly crap movie ( at least that's what I've heard -- haven't seen it). However I wouldn't mind at all if the gorgeous Mrs. Duchovny, Ms. Tea Leoni, found this site and decided to read. She's been a favourite of mine for a long time. [By the way, Dan, this is for you -- I recently caught Return to Me on BBC -- code s.s.]
So you have a passion for movie talk, I see.
Yes I do. And as I said, from time to time I'll post things here that may not have to do with films specifically (or may not even be politically correct), but they will usually have to do with popular culture or our current place in this world.
Are you excited about Batman Begins?
Is that a planted question? "Could I be more excited?" is the question! From everything I'm hearing, this is the film the Bat-fans have waited years for. After the adventures in Schumacher-land and the Superman debacle (in development hell for ten years), I was ready to give up on Warner Bros., until I heard this thing was being made. And now, I happily, proudly display my Batman animated figures and related merchandising wherever I want in my flat. You know, David Duchovny was once considered to play Batman...(The interviewer slaps Michael D. to shut him up)
Alright, so what do you hope people get out of this blog?
Hey, I'm not trying to change peoples' lives here -- just to score a place to vent some of my joy and frustrations with the modern world, rather than talking to myself or breathing on other people (which they don't find very pleasant). Hopefully a few people will be interested in what I have to say, and my decision to follow the path of the Dragon...
Any final messages in case this is the only visit someone makes to your page?
Good afternoon, good evening and good night. ...Yep.
Oh, and...Hello to my Parents!
Next up: Why I think Star Wars -- Episode III: Revenge of the Sith is surprisingly heartfelt.
Posted by Michael D. @ 8:15 PM |
|